3/18/2024 0 Comments Picture of firmament godly play![]() ![]() ![]() So, presumably, since the ‘waters above’ are still said to exist in Psalm 148:4, Holding thinks the stars can be called waters in virtue of having been made from that substance. ![]() Holding suggests in Is the raqîa’ (‘firmament’) a solid dome? that the ‘waters’ refer to an elementary substance that was transformed into astronomical bodies like stars and planets. I know I’ve come across many unique views on this topic. And there are many other discussions of this subject scattered throughout our website and in various products from our webstore, like The Genesis Account. We also dealt with this issue to some extent in my talk about Days 2 & 3 ( Session #4) in The Genesis Academy, though a lot could be added to my brief comments there. But it’s controversial, and creationists have different opinions. It’s funny you ask, because a paper I published in Journal of Creation back in 2021 was recently made available as the featured article on, and it deals with this very issue. I tried looking on your site but haven’t found what I’m looking for exactly.īlessings The ‘waters above’ are still said to exist in Psalm 148:4. Any ideas on what is meant by the separation of the waters? It appears that there is water above the sun and stars, which seems really weird. I’ve just been trying to find out some info on Genesis 1:14, specifically how it interacts with the waters above in verse 6. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |